THE CHANGE OF FREQUENCY OF PHOTO

COPY RIGHT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY PROFESSOR, DOCTOR, PT PAPPAS, 7/3/2012.
IN PART OR IN WHOLE OR ITS ESSENCE MIGHT BE REPRODUCED, PROVIDED REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE PRESENT AND TO ITS AUTHOR.

FIRST.

THE INFLUENCE OF GRAVITATION OF A BODY IS FINALLY DEPENDED TO 1/r² WHERE r IS A BIG ENOUGH DISTANCE FROM THE BODY OF ANY SHAPE.

HOWEVER, THE EQUIVALENT GRAVITY OF A BODY DUE TO AN ACCELERATED FRAME, IS ALWAYS AND EVERYWHERE CONSTANT OF INTENSITY "g", CORRESPONDING TO THE ACCELERATION OF THE ACCELERATED FRAME!

SECOND.

THE CHANGE OF FREQUENCY OF PHOTONS IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD, (see http://www.papimi.gr/gf.htm) IS:

dν/v₀=1/c²^.gdx or
dν=v₀1/c²^.gdx,
that is a function of "g" in a static frame with gravity of intensity "g". That way, the gravitational field can not be described or can not be equivalent to an accelerating frame with acceleration "g". The accelerating frame is characterized by an accomplished final velocity "u", every other instant. As a result, it causes a Doppler change of frequency and nothing else, to a wave form, such as photons, (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect), given:

$f = \left ( \frac {c + v_{r}}{c} \right ) f_0$ ,
WHICH IS A FUNCTION OF THE INSTANT VELOCITY "u", AND NOT OF THE ACCELERATION "g" CONTRARY TO THE ASSUMED EQUIVALENT CASE.
THEREFORE, THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD CAN NOT BE EQUIVALENT TO AN ACCELERATING FRAME, AS EINSTEIN BELIEVED AND CLAIMED, WHEN HE WAS BASING THE FOUNDATIONS OF HIS GENERAL RELATIVITY IN 1916.

SIGNIFICANT REMARK:

NOW, THAT WE REALIZE THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD IS NOT EQUIVALENT TO ACCELERATING FRAMES, WHICH WRONGLY DESCRIBE IT, AND WHICH FRAMES ARE PURELY KINEMATICAL CONCEPTS THAT EXCLUDE ANY CORRECT IDEA OF GRAVITY. AND THEREFORE, OF ANTIGRAVITY, WE HAVE TO EXPLORE GRAVITY-ANTIGRAVITY IN A DIFFERENT AND APPROPRIATE WAY...

EINSTEIN FOOLS AGAIN