THE PERIHELION OF MERCURY CONFIRMATION MYTH OF GENERAL RELATIVITY
FIRST, WE SHOULD SAY, THE PERIHELION OF A TRAJECTORY IS NOT A SHARP POINT TO BE SELECTED ACCURATELY BY ASTRONOMY. SO THIS MAKES A SERIOUS DOUBT FOR THIS CLAIM, CONCERNING A SHARP DETERMINATION TO BE MEASURED ONCE IN HUMAN HISTORY.
THE PERIHELION OF MERCURY IS CONSIDERED AS ONE OF THE
THREE MAIN EXPERIMENTAL OBSERVATIONS OF ASTRONOMY WHICH VERIFY GENERAL
RELATIVITY OF EINSTEIN.
THE OTHER TWO ARE THE BENDING OF LIGHT, PASSING TANGENTIAL BY THE PERIPHERY OF
SUN, AND THE TIME DELAY IN A GRAVITATIONAL. WE SHALL EXAMINE EACH ONE HERE,
FIRST THE PERIHELION OF MERCURY.
THE PERIHELION OF MERCURY IS CONSIDERED TO BE THE ROTATION OF THE ELLIPTICAL
TRAJECTORY OF MERCURY AROUND THE SUN, THAT IS THE ROTATION OF THE GREAT AXIS OF
THE ELLIPTICAL TRAJECTORY OF MERCURY, THAT IS 28 TO 32 SECONDS OF A DEGREE PER
CENTURY.
FIRST BOOKS WERE REFERRING TO 28 SECONDS OF AN ARC PER
CENTURY, LIKE THE NOBEL LAUREATE'S BOOK OF LAVY LADAUE; "THEORETICAL
PHYSICS".
IN A LATER EDITION OF THE BOOK, THIS FIGURE OF 28 SECONDS OF AN ARC PER CENTURY,
BECAME 32 SECONDS OF AN ARC PER CENTURY!
THIS FACT MADE SUSPICIOUS THE AUTHOR WHO DECIDED TO CHECK HIMSELF, THE ACTUAL
VALUE OF THIS EFFECT.
IT WAS THE TIME THAT THIS AUTHOR WAS A POST GRADUATE STUDENT FOR PHD IN THE
UNIVERSITY OF LONDON.
BEING SO, THE AUTHOR HAD TO HIS DISPOSAL THE BRITISH MUSEUM LIBRARY- ONE OF THE
BIGGEST LIBRARY'S OF UK, AS WELL AS, PRACTICALLY ALL THE LIBRARY'S OF ENGLAND.
THE AUTHOR COULD NOT LOCATE ANY THING RELEVANT. FOR THE MEASUREMENT WAS A
DIFFERENTIAL MEASUREMENT, FROM AN ERA EXPANDING TO ANOTHER ERA BEYOND HIS LIFE
TIME. SO THERE WAS NO RECORD OF THIS LONGER THAN A LIFE TIME PROCEDURE.
IT IS A JOKE FOR A SCIENTIST, TRYING TO CONFIRM OR DISPROVE ONE OF THE ABOVE FO BE4IGURES. APPARENTLY, THE REAL VALUE WAS CHOSEN TO THE ONE THAT MATCHES BETTER AND VERIFIES GENERAL RELATIVITY OF EINSTEIN, CONFORMING AND COMPILING TO THE GENERAL SCIENTIFIC CONSPIRACY !
IF THERE IS A SCIENTIST ON EARTH WHO MAY CONFIRM OR DISPROVE THESE FIGURES, LET US KNOW TOO !
EVEN WE ASSUME ONE OF THESE FIGURES IS THE REAL FIGURE THAT WE HAVE FOUND, THEN THIS FIGURE IS UNLIKELY TO BE A REAL TINY FIGURE OF OUR VERY COMPLICATED SOLAR SYSTEM, CONSISTED OF TOO MANY OTHER DYNAMIC GRAVITATIONAL PERTURBATIONS OF THE OTHER CO ROTATING PLANETS.
THE AUTHOR ATTEMPTED TO CALCULATE THE PERIHELION SHIFT DUE TO A LORENTZ EFFECT, OF OTHER PLANETS.
HE DID SO WHILE A POST GRADUATE STUDENT AT THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON, WITH THE HELP OF FORTRAN AND USING THE BIG COMPUTER OF THE UNIVERSITY WITH OLD FASHION PROGRAMMING CARDS.
HE WAS GIVING IN THE PROGRAMMING CARDS WITH THE RELEVANT PROGRAM TO GET THE ANSWER NEXT DAY, THAT A COMMA WAS MISSING AND THE PROGRAM DID NOT RUN.
SIX MONTHS WAS TRYING TO CORRECT THE OLD FASHION PROGRAM LIKE THAT.
WHEN THE PROGRAM WAS READY, RUNNING A SHORT TRIAL VERSION, THE AUTHOR DECIDED TO RUN THE FULL VERSION.
NEXT DAY, HE GOT THE ANSWER IN A PAPER WHICH OF ONE LINE. ALL THE LONG ANSWER WAS PRINTED ON THIS LINE MAKING A LONG DARK UNREADABLE MARK, AS THE PAPER WAS STACK AND NOT RUNNING!
THE AUTHOR WAS DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED FOR HIS LOST TIME AND FOR EXHAUSTING HIS DEDICATED TIME BY THE UNIVERSITY.!
AS THE AUTHOR WAS NOT SUSPI9CIOUS THAT TIME FOR THE ACTIVE CONSPIRACY, HE GAVE, DISAPPOINTED, UP. THIS NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, NEVER TO RETURN TO IT AND TO BE TO RELATIVELY MUCH FASTER THEORETICAL PHYSICS, BESIDES HIS TIME WAS RUNNING, IN THE MEAN TIME, SHORTER.
IN THIS WAY, IT SHOULD BE AN ACCIDENTAL FIGURE FOR THE FACT, WE HAVE MEASURED ONLY ONCE THIS FIGURE IN THE LAST 100 YEARS THAT ASTRONOMY WAS CAPABLE MEASURING IT. !
Of course, the perihelion of the other planets of our solar system are completely different, even in sign, from the ones predicted by G.R. (L. Brilouen)
So, better keep silent and do not dare to suggest to a real scientist, that one of these is the correct one, as even a bluff, unless you may suggest that you are at least one thousand years old- 1000 years old!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Unless, you BELONG at the pro EINSTEIN CONSPIRACY!