The infallible AMPERE law and the fallibility of Lorentz law

SEE ALSO SECTION (5.01)

UNBELIEVABLE DEVIOUS AND POSSIBLE CRIMINAL  INACCURACIES, OMISSIONS AND FICTITIOUS FACTS

INTRODUCTION TO ELECTRODYNAMICS II by DAVID  GRIFFITHS, UNIVERSITY EDITIONS OF CRETE
AND PRENTICE  HALL INTERNATIONAL 2001, ISBN set: 960-24-014-9, p. 69 chapter 7.5.1.,

ENERGY AND MOMENTUM IN ELECTRODYNAMICS
- CENSORSHIP -

The above diagram shows a Lambda shape conductor "Λ" with two sections. According to the fictitious law of Lorentz of classical Electrodynamics, on each section a perpendicular force F₁ or F₂  is applied due to the other section as shown above. Obviously the two forces on the lamda shape have an on zero resultant. Therefore a fictitious self propelling force, a force without reaction is applied on the Lamda shape system of conductors, imposed by the fictitious law of Lorentz. This force creates momentum for the lambda shape system. In order to conserve momentum the Classical  Electrodynamics claims compulsory that an opposite fictitious momentum goes off  to the field, in other words some kind of a non existing  momentum is assumed to be  emitted. However, no any kind of emission has ever been ever been observed, on kind of conductor carrying a DC current, neither one is expected by any other4 correct theory. This is a ridiculous claim made by the above book and of the other classical books in this kind, copying one another with nonsense that they copy! INSTEAD THAN STANDING UP AND SAY THAT CLASSICAL ELECTRODYNAMICS CAN NOT BE CORRECT WITH THE LORENTZ LAW. The author has explored this case and he has been brave enough to do relevant experiments to show that the Lorenz force law is not correct and he has published these results in pear review journals such as the pi experiment or the z-antenna experiment. (detailed references will be given below), as a result was the Author to be thrown out of the National Technical University of Athens in 1970s and other collaborators to be threaten, instead of little men allowing the advance of knowledge for Humanity. Today, the Ampere force law (see below) has been found infallible but Humanity should not know this. Why ????

Ampere forces always retain

action - reaction

For the same circuite case, the Ampere forces are shown. They always retain action and reaction. So their resultant is always zero as for the case of mechanical internal forces always add to zero. So there is no need for assuming any photon emission to balance the defect of conservation of momentum as actually experimentally is observed.  The law Ampere and the law of Loretz always are numerically and quantitatively equal they differ in the details of force distribution. Never theless, the superiority of Ampere force law becomes obvious.
We read in this text (after the necessary translation): The electrodynamics force that  charge q₁  exercises on charge q₂   are equal, of course, to the force q₂   exercise on q_1, however, these forces are not opposite, violating, like this, the principle of action and reaction Newton's third law. In electrostatics and magnetostatcs the third law is valid, however in electrodynamics, this law is not valid.......

The only way to maintain the momentum conservation  in electrodynamics is to understand that fields themselves carry the missing momentum...Any way these fields carry also energy, as we know, they carry also momentum, so that the total momentum is conserved. Like this, in the following, we shall prove conservation of energy and momentum...Similar statements and arguments are in other modern books of electrodynamics like: David Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics", similar books as Philips and Panofski, Alonso and Finn etc modern books. In older books before 1905, it was claimed that the missing momentum, due to not action being opposite to reaction, was given by the ether, but after 1905 there was no ether ,so the argument was changed  to the fields. In modern Electrodynamics, because a momentum P, carries an energy E = PC. The momentum as well  as the energy together are transmitted by photons of certain frequency " v".
We may ask therefore, what is this frequency of these photons ? And to what this frequency relates to the system ? There is absolutely no answer, but the most important, this missing momentum might be related to a circuit of shape  of A Greek capital L, "Λ" with the two forces assumed to be perpendicular to the two sides of "Λ", and, of course, the two forces are not opposite. Therefore, the "Λ" , should allegedly radiate some photons of unknown frequency to balance the missing momentum. The incredible thing is that these forces might be due to a DC electrical current that is found never and under any circumstances to radiate any thing !!!  A incredible inaccuracy and a probable devious claim made by modern classical electrodynamics!
What is also totally inaccurate and totally wrong is the energy of the field associate with the amount of momentum this field is wrongly assumed to carry. For example if the field carries P/1second = 100 GRX 4 CM/SEC = 0.1 KGRX0,04METERS/SEC momentum = 0,004 in MKS UNITS, then the corresponding energy of the field for duration only 4 seconds is E= 4xPXC=4X0,004X3X10⁵X10³  =4X12X10⁵ JOULSE =4,8X10⁶. This amount of energy is enormous. For it may be realized by a car battery of typical 12 volts and 50 amperexhours =600 watthours = 600x3600wattxseconds = 6x36x 10⁴ = 216x10⁴ = 2,16x10⁶ joules only that would have been exhausted in 4 seconds. An experiment with these numbers was done in 70s at the National Technical University of Athens (published...to be given) and the battery was new after the experiment, not showing any sign of discharging and exhaustion!

This inaccuracy of emitted momentum, was completed in two stages in the last 100 years. First the original Ampere force, for this case was omitted and forgotten and replaced gradually by Biot and Savart law, by the Grassman law, later with one of Rieman's, Gausse, and finally by the Lorentz force law which was adopted by Einstein  The second stage done by rejecting the ether which was done mainly again by Einstein. The  cardinal law  of Electrodynamics of Ampere as it was called by Maxwell, is unknown today by less than 99,99% of scientists  for two arbitrary currents I₁, I₂  on ds₁ , ds₂  length elements and it is as follows

where F₁₂ is the force from 1 current to 2 current and r₁₂ or r₂₁ is the position vector from 1 to 2 or from 2 to 1_.

This law of AMPERE, in 1821  1826 to the French Academy of Science, retains always action and reaction. No need for photon emission as no photon emission is experimentally  really ever observed and neveris known to occur for DC.
When the law of AMPERE and that of LORENTZ is integrated for closed circuits which only is assumed to exist they are equivalent. This is why the wrong law of Lorentz may survive!

Also with an AC current the fallibility of Lorentz law can be shown. Consider two lambda shpes with a common side but ant parallel connected as in the diagram below:

This experiment was done was done in Modesto, California in a private farm, by the Author again in 70s and has been published in a pear review journal (details will be given later)
A Z shape - antenna has a total length l, it is tuning at 400 MHz radio AC current and is hanging by thin thread from the ceiling. The Antenna is equipped with a coil in the middle, as shown above  and it is coupled to another stationary coil which supplies the radio frequency  to the antenna. The antenna was checked by a fluorescent long tube to confirm that it was tuning as expected.  Two ant parallel forces should be expected to apply at the two opposite lambda shapes. The two forces  form a couple of ant parallel forces, expected to rotate the z- antenna. No rotation was noticed, though, the whole system was enclosed in a  transparent nylon sheet.  In order to confirm that the sensitivity of the system was adequate to cause a rotation, a second straight antenna of the same tuning length l, as shown, was inserted in the nylon protected cage. Some smaller, though currents of the same frequency and opposite phase were expected to be induced to the second antenna by the first and exercise forces of smaller magnitude than the self propelling Lorentz forces, which if existed should have rotated the Z- antenna. The freely rotating z-antenna moved noticeable and violently HOWEVER WITH THE SMALLER FORCES. This fact disproves the Lorentz forces independently and again. Therefore some kind of forces obeying action and reaction were in effect in these experiment like the Ampere forces, definitely not the Lorentz forces of Relativity Theory, now copied by Einstein.

You might think high of Special Relativity Thyeory Einstein, let me ask a question. But let me point to you that this Theory is based on inertial frames of referenc4 and the employed transformations between them. I ask you to point ton me two inertial frames you know an7 twos you know! the answer is there not a single pair. Then which Relativity Theory you know ? GIVE ME AN ANSWER!!!

 You might think high of Quantum Electrodynamics. This theory is concerned of the motion and interaction of charged or no charged elementary particles, using the Lorentz force, then what do expect ? Quantum Electrodynamics makes the same in adopting the Lorentz force! Now what do you expect QED to go farther and adopt that the field carries the missing momentum by something they do not want to call them photons, but more correctly VIRTUAL PHOTONS, but really how much virtual or fictitious these photons are? Finally under the same reasoning QED should be concerned with motions and interactions of MICROSCOPIC BIG BODIES WITH OR WITHOUT CHARGES LIKE CHARGED  OR NOT CHARGED FOOT BALLS.

There is silence and in  this branch of Physics deviously and strangely enough  this natural branch of physics is missing from science, then virtual quantized photons could not be hidden any more, but is this the sole responsibility of QED or the QED IS THE GOOD BOY! For whom, then?  

Topics we shall be concerned here next:
 In steady DC currents, forces for closed circuits can  be distinguished numerically that are due to Ampere's or  to Lorentz's force laws (See section MAGNETS, (3c)). Also by forces due to sparks, lightning, any transient currents. can be distinguished whether they belong to one of the two laws, actually they belong only to one, that of the correct law of Ampere or to the fictitious law of Lorentz ! This is for due to the fact that these currents are transient in very short time. Let me become clear. Suppose we have a stead state current in a closed circuit. All its forces are indistinguishable in origin. Suppose the circuit is suddenly interrupted by a spark unavoidably in a gap, then in the copper parts of the circuit charges are moving very slowly, as in every metallic conductor some cm/second, on the contrary in the unavoidable spark charges may move at any high speed. THEREFORE, DUE TO THE INERTIA, THE FAST MOVING CHARGES KEEP MOVING LONGER AND CONSTITUTE AN ISOLATED CURRENT.! ISOLATED CURRENTS EXHIBIT LONGITUDINAL AMPERE FORCES, WHICH DO NOT CANCEL OUT. As a result an Ampere explosion occurs with a loud audible sound. This explosion can be explained in terms only of Ampere forces. It becomes very evident in water arc explosions of Professor Graneau of MIT Boston Massachusetts  of USA and his colloquies like the Author, before Professor Graneu was thrown out of MIT, similar to the Author's thrown out from the National Technical University of Athens Greece, and  like Harold Aspden (thrown out) Professor of Cambridge University, UK (from whom th author first learned about the withdrawn the Ampere force law) like as they were doing a top secret, forbitten and illegal experiment!!!!!!!! SIMILAR PHENOMENA HAPPENS WITH LIGHTNING OR ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGES  where we have short duration transient and isolated currents.
Please note: All the three public places, which these experiments,  were done, were in trouble except,  in the private sector in Modesto, California. Coincidence   ??????????????     
DLorentz invariance is not obeyed by the Ampere force, however it is obeyed by the Lorentz force law for which the relavent transformations were invented by Lorentz. However I would say for a theory (of relativity that uses the Lorentz transformations?) that uses inertial reference of frames moving with constant relative velocity which really does not exist. That is for a theory that is not physical at all.
Where the Ampere forces may be observed, see above and the section  on MAGNETS, (3c)
OTHER HIDDEN CONSEQUENCES, really I am not sure to say.
 The whole story of the modern censorship of the Ampere force makes me think and question: Is there an Extra Terrestrial Influence or HOSTILE ACTION against humanity ?......

References

1.  Forces on a Stigma Antenna.   P. T. Pappas  Tim Vaughan :  Phys. Essays 3, 211 (1990).  google search here  - saved search here

2.  The original Ampere force and Biot-Savart Lorentz forces.  P.T. Pappas, : Nuovo Cimento 76B, 189, 1983.  google search here - saved search here

3.  The Cardinal Law of Electrodynamics, the Principle of Conservation of Energy and the Tesla Magnifying Effect. - P.T. Pappas,  International Tesla Symposium, Colorado, Springs, 1988.

SEE ALSO SECTION (5.01)